| Pages: [1] |
1. Smart bomb area on large ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Tarunik Raqalth'Qui wrote: Cid Tazer wrote: Jiska Ensa wrote: Um I don't think you're on the same page as everyone else. Large shield extenders do not affect anything beyond the attributes of the ship it's mounted on. Smartbombs do. They ...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.08.03 15:40:00
|
2. Smart bomb area on large ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Jiska Ensa wrote: Um I don't think you're on the same page as everyone else. Large shield extenders do not affect anything beyond the attributes of the ship it's mounted on. Smartbombs do. They can not be compared as they are entirely different...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.08.03 14:40:00
|
3. Smart bomb area on large ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Zicon Shak'ra wrote: If smartbombs on capital ships hit the same area as a battleship, they would never reach outside the hull of the ship. /thread So we're ok with 15KM smartbombs having a blast area of > 15KM cubed? I don't know of any...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.08.03 14:10:00
|
4. Smart bomb area on large ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I don't have capital ships so I cannot test this myself, but is the volume covered by smart bombs on capital ships larger than the same class of smartbomb on subcap ships? Is this working properly? Should smart bombs cover the same area regard...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.08.03 13:58:00
|
5. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: I'm honestly reluctant to push this change any further at this point, and we're reasonably hopeful that the combination of the locked-targets reduction, the damage reduction and the tracking nerf will give people enough wig...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.04.18 17:26:00
|
6. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CynoNet Two wrote: Cid Tazer wrote: pmchem wrote: CynoNet Two wrote: Without sufficient pilots around they will find themselves permanantly on zero cap by multiple officer neuts and unable to tackle, or to tank well. Yeah, even wit...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.04.18 15:46:00
|
7. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
pmchem wrote: CynoNet Two wrote: Without sufficient pilots around they will find themselves permanantly on zero cap by multiple officer neuts and unable to tackle, or to tank well. Yeah, even with cap-injected fits, hictors are hilarious...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.04.18 15:06:00
|
8. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: - For the time being, yes, this isn't a long-term equilibrium. - Not hugely, but for the time being yes, see previous question. - Yes, there in fact are still fights that don't involve multiple titans. A lot of us are ...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.04.18 14:35:00
|
9. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: CynoNet Two wrote: Hi Greyscale! After some testing we've found that dictors are still hilariously vulnerable to being picked off, especially since the tracking and target painter situations are unchanged. Current super...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.04.18 14:24:00
|
10. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
steave435 wrote: Cid Tazer wrote: steave435 wrote: An Avatar is firing at a Tempest. The XL lasers that the Avatar is using has a sig res of 1000, and the Tempest has a signature of 340, so the sig ratio is 340/1000 = 0.34. Modify the da...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.03.30 13:44:00
|
11. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
steave435 wrote: An Avatar is firing at a Tempest. The XL lasers that the Avatar is using has a sig res of 1000, and the Tempest has a signature of 340, so the sig ratio is 340/1000 = 0.34. Modify the damage the Tempest would normally have tak...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.03.30 13:27:00
|
12. Titan changes - update - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
CCP Greyscale wrote: CynoNet Two wrote: CCP Greyscale wrote: I see what you're getting at, I think. Can this not be mitigated by just adjusting the falloff formula*, alongside potentially adjusting the general balance between optimal and ...
- by Cid Tazer - at 2012.03.30 12:55:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |